indycycle

Title Posted
maghoney wall init 13 Nov
Wanted 8 Nov
gravel 19 Oct
matrix dvd box set 12 Oct

Ashley Road eviction resistance

category bristol | protests | news report author Wednesday November 12, 2008 17:52author by billy Report this post to the editors

Pictures and leaflet text from today

see newswire link below for story and comments
http://bristol.indymedia.org/article/689221
and get down there to show support, it's going to be a chilly night but the moon is out!

imga0278.jpg

Dear Neighbours

At 10.am this morning (12/11/08) police and bailiffs smashed their way into 87 Ashley Road evicting some of the occupants. Several people are on the roof, while contractors and bailiffs rip up the inside to make the house uninhabitable.

We are resisting this eviction because…

1.We need somewhere to live.
2.Taking your housing needs into your own hands is a positive thing, especially when social housing has such long waiting lists.
3.This building has been left empty for at least 4 years, during this time both Places for People (P4P) and Bristol Churches (previous owners) have made no attempt to renovate or convert it into social housing. That’s 8 potential flats that have been left to rot. And for the past 6 months no.87 has housed more than 30 people.
4.P4P have no planning permission to use or renovate this building. This morning a P4P representative said that the only active planning application they have is for April 2009, where 87 will contain a ‘site office’ for the ‘development’ of 16 other ‘shared ownership’ properties in the St. Pauls Area.
5.St. Pauls UnLtd have opposed P4P’s plans because they did not provide enough social housing or affordable housing.
6.Existing P4P tenants complain about the standard of service of maintenance in their existing properties.
7.Everyone has a right to a home: Squatting is legal, necessary, and provides an alternative to the stranglehold of debt that underpins the current financial crisis.
8.Tying people into 30+years of mortgage debt is an illusion of housing security, in the light recent repossessions.
9.We are part of this community and against all privatizations, repossessions and evictions.

P4P are more concerned with money than housing those in need they are the biggest UK housing association and have the highest paid chief executives in the housing sector (Director salary: £258k in 2007). Housing associations were set up to fill the gap left by Thatcher’s destruction of social housing provision. They cannot legally make profits, but make up for this with fat bonus checks for the fat cats. That’s taxpayer’s money going to fund extravagant lifestyles

‘Direct action is better than any waiting list’ Squatters handbook. (Or mortgage!)

imga0290.jpg

imga0291.jpg

author by eye witnesspublication date Wed Nov 12, 2008 17:55Report this post to the editors

Since they entered at 10am contractors have been trashing the inside of 87 Ashley Rd to make it inhabitable, taking out utilities and smashing it up. We know about office plans direct from People for Places rep who spoke to the people on the roof, not a bailiff. He said their plans are to make this 8 flat building in a site office in April 2009. That's another 5 months of it standing empty to add to the 4 years already, while it could be providing homes to the 15 odd people who were living there, keeping it used and useful.
People are resisting this eviction not only because they need a house but because we believe that P4P are not fit for purpose for being social landlords. People passing in the street have told us stories of months and years waiting for basic maintenance. The same rep talking to those of roof admitted that he was ignorant of St Paul's UnLtd's objections to their plans for 87 Ashley Road. He had not even read the minutes. Some in St Paul's UnLtd objected to their plans because of concerns that they did not provide enough social/affordable housing.

This morning P4P's Luke Tekouchi has put out a letter to local residents with a load of spin about how trespassers are preventing them house those in need. If this is the case why have they not done something with the building before and why are there no planning applications for them to renovate the building?

Shared ownership = sell off of social housing. P4P are more interested in making money in the short term. Tying people into 30+ years of a mortgage, (let's not forget it comes from the word meaning Death Grip) IS NOT a solution to the housing problem. Look at the ramifications of a society built on a debt bubble in the collapse of the sub prime mortgage crisis in the US. And look at the predicted figures of thousands who face repossessions in the coming financial depression in the UK.

Squatting is one way of breaking out of this dead end cycle. And the people who are taking direct action to claim their right for somewhere to live think that's better in so many ways than waiting around on a housing list.

Supporters and those on the roof intend to stay and all are welcome to come down and show support.

author by Heatherpublication date Wed Nov 12, 2008 19:07Report this post to the editors

Hi,
My name is Heather. I'm a journalist and I want to write a story on what is going on- can anyone who is involved in the situation contact me? My email address is Heath0183@aol.com.

author by anonyMousepublication date Wed Nov 12, 2008 19:09Report this post to the editors

The Ashley Road site will not be developed as either shared ownership or social housing. The finances do not add up for this because of the drop in property prices. When the flats are developed they will be let on an intermediate rent. This means the rent will be 20% lower than the market rent but significantly higher than normal Housing Association national formula rents It also means they won't be let to people prioritised by need through the Bristol Housing Register but instead by ability to pay.

author by frankie - individualpublication date Tue Feb 17, 2009 18:14author email vron18will at uwclub dot netReport this post to the editors

Whatever happened to 'Self Help' the legal short-term squat letting organisation. It used to exist and was able to completely legally take over buildings like this, I believe with the knowledge and consent of local council, to provide much needed accommodation. Does it still exist?

 
© 2001-2009 Bristol Indymedia. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Bristol Indymedia. Disclaimer | Privacy